Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | No |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
Total Surveyed | 00 | |
Response rate % | NaN% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,100 |
C. Total | 2,100 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,100 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 15 | $5,200 | $0 | $5,200 |
Hearing | 12 | $2,101 | $0 | $2,101 |
Speech Communication | 08 | $1,998 | $0 | $1,998 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 19 | $3,517 | $0 | $3,517 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 588 | $493,853 | $0 | $493,853 |
Daily Living | 1,385 | $167,316 | $0 | $167,316 |
Environmental Adaptations | 38 | $11,825 | $0 | $11,825 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 07 | $19,159 | $0 | $19,159 |
Computers and Related | 14 | $2,441 | $0 | $2,441 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 14 | $1,830 | $0 | $1,830 |
Total | 2,100 | $709,240 | $0 | $709,240 |
Project CARAT (Kentucky's refurbish/ reuse program) was approached with an amazing donation of a massive ramp system valued at between $10,000-$17,000. The challenge was how were we going to break this down into manageable pieces to get to one of our refurbish sites? JustServe Kentucky (JustServe is a service to help link community volunteer needs with volunteers ) stepped in with a team to assist! The team was assembled out of 3 different congregations of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Louisville comprised of around 15 individuals. The work took around 20 person-hours taking down sections, removing railing, and using grinder tools on soldered parts. The ramp system went to our site in Paintsville KY and parts have been distributed to FOUR consumers in need. One individual was returning from a rehabilitation facility and would be unable to enter or exit his home without ramps. Insurance would not cover home modification. Project CARAT was able to provide the ramp and his neighbors installed it for him. The second individual needed ramps to assist his wife in and out of their home. He indicated that he had been lifting and pulling her into the home, but due to his own physical condition was becoming less able to move her. CARAT provided the ramp which greatly improved this family's mobility concerns.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 60 | 03 | 1,948 | 2,011 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 15 | 16 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 27 | 27 |
4. Subtotal | 61 | 03 | 1,990 | 2,054 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 08 | 09 |
6. Subtotal | 62 | 03 | 1,998 | 2,063 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 37 | 37 |
8. Total | 62 | 03 | 2,035 | 2,100 |
9. Performance on this measure | 98.39% | 100% | 97.79% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 2,083 | 99.19% |
Satisfied | 04 | 0.19% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 13 | 0.62% |
Total Surveyed | 2,100 | |
Response rate % | 99.38% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 419 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 18 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 380 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 08 |
Total | 825 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 96 | 00 | 96 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 390 | 00 | 390 |
Representative of Education | 54 | 00 | 54 |
Representative of Employment | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 252 | 00 | 252 |
Representatives of Community Living | 23 | 00 | 23 |
Representatives of Technology | 08 | 00 | 08 |
Total | 825 | 00 | 825 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 25 | 00 | 25 |
Hearing | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Speech Communication | 157 | 00 | 157 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 200 | 00 | 200 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 312 | 00 | 312 |
Daily Living | 93 | 00 | 93 |
Environmental Adaptations | 153 | 00 | 153 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 146 | 00 | 146 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 230 | 00 | 230 |
Total | 1,320 | 00 | 1,320 |
Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant in the local school system borrowed a Big Key Calculator to trial with two of her students who had low vision. She reported the larger buttons were much easier for them to activate with limited fine motor skills. The school approved purchase in order to provide accommodations in the classroom.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 49 | 01 | 353 | 403 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 00 | 07 | 09 |
Subtotal | 51 | 01 | 360 | 412 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 04 | 05 |
Subtotal | 52 | 01 | 364 | 417 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 53 | 01 | 365 | 419 |
Performance on this measure | 98.08% | 100% | 98.9% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 115 | 05 | 271 | 391 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
4. Subtotal | 116 | 05 | 277 | 398 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 116 | 05 | 278 | 399 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 06 | 07 |
8. Total | 116 | 06 | 284 | 406 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.64% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 819 | 99.27% |
Satisfied | 02 | 0.24% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.24% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 0.24% |
Total Surveyed | 825 | |
Response rate % | 99.76% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 02 |
Hearing | 00 |
Speech Communication | 47 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 10 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 03 |
Daily Living | 03 |
Environmental Adaptations | 01 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 02 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 69 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 70 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 64 |
Representatives of Education | 50 |
Representatives of Employment | 00 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 40 |
Representative of Community Living | 09 |
Representative of Technology | 03 |
Total | 236 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 31 |
Service Provider | 00 |
Vendor | 24 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 55 |
Speech Language Pathologist from Wendell Foster completed an Alternative & Augmentative (AAC) assessment for a 6-year old child with Autism from McCracken County. Therapist demonstrated Nova Chat 10, Pro Slate 10D, I-110, Prio, and Sounding Board app on iPad. Child was able to use the Nova Chat 10 to request a preferred toy and family decided upon a trial with the device.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 07 | 01 | 58 | 66 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 58 | 66 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 61 | 69 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 07 | 01 | 61 | 69 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 95.08% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 236 | 100% |
Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 236 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 175 | 08 | 2,219 | 2,402 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 00 | 18 | 20 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 30 | 30 |
4. Subtotal | 177 | 08 | 2,267 | 2,452 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 09 | 10 |
6. Subtotal | 178 | 08 | 2,276 | 2,462 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 43 | 44 |
8. Total | 178 | 09 | 2,319 | 2,506 |
9. Performance on this measure | 99.44% | 100% | 96.71% | 96.92% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 56 | 02 | 411 | 469 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 00 | 07 | 09 |
Subtotal | 58 | 02 | 418 | 478 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 07 | 08 |
Subtotal | 59 | 02 | 425 | 486 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 60 | 02 | 426 | 488 |
Performance on this measure | 98.31% | 100% | 98.35% | 98.35% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.94% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.53% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 03 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 00 |
Representatives of Education | 33 |
Representatives of Employment | 06 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 549 |
Representatives of Community Living | 25 |
Representatives of Technology | 17 |
Unable to Categorize | 01 |
TOTAL | 634 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
479 | 122 | 33 | 634 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 159 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 02 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 314 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 56 |
Transition | 103 |
Total | 634 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
The Art of the AAC Assessment Karissa Riter, M.S., CCC-SLP, ATP, Wendell Fosters Campus presented as part of the KATS Summer AT Conference. The session discussed conducting an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) assessment to help determine the best communication method(s) for an individual. This included discussion of the knowledge required of various areas including language skills, cognition, positioning, sensory, vision, hearing, etc. This session also covered how the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Participation Model (2004) is used in conjunction with a capability assessment to help make decisions about appropriate AAC. There were 52 individuals in attendance, including staff from KY OVR, universities, secondary schools, ATPs, and community rehab providers (CRPs)
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Jacqui Kearns, Ed.D presented “Don’t let them leave without it!” at the Summer AT Conference. Communication is essential for participation in all of life from social engagement & friendships, literacy & learning, to decision-making & safety. Yet, many students with complex needs leave preschool, elementary school, middle school, and even high school without this necessity. While communication is multi-modal, AAC is an essential component for developing and maintaining relationships. This session discussed advocacy tips and guidance to ensure students have access to their AAC devices during and after school, etc. There were 52 individuals in attendance, including staff from KY OVR, universities, secondary schools, ATPs, and community rehab providers (CRPs)
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Using Microsoft Word to Create More Accessible Documents Microsoft Word has several features that help document creators and editors to create more accessible documents. And, more accessible Word documents create more accessible PDF files as well. Rob Carr, of Oklahoma ABLE Tech’s technology accessibility program provided training on tools and techniques in Microsoft Word to make sure that your documents are more accessible. Training was part of the KATS Network annual Summer AT Conference. Presentation included discussion and demonstration how Word supports creating accessible document titles, properly structured headings, properly structured lists, text equivalents for visual elements, more accessible data tables, using color more carefully, and providing descriptive text for links. Participants left the session with more confidence that their Word documents are more accessible to people with disabilities. There were 56 individuals in attendance, including staff from KY OVR, universities, secondary schools and community rehab providers (CRPs)
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 56 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 56 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 0% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Education | 4% |
---|---|
Employment | 23% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 63% |
Community Living | 8% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 2% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
KATS program coordinator provided technical assistance to the KY office of Unemployment Insurance that included an accessibility review of a new web portal that they were having developed to allow individuals to file and manage UI claims. KATS recruited two staff from the OVR Rehab Tech Branch (one a screen reader user) to assist with testing. Testing included programmatic/automated testing and manual user testing/review of the site, including registering, logging in and filing a UI claim, managing a claim and editing user profile. Identified issues were recorded and reported back to Sandy Harp, Executive Director of the Education and Workforce Development Cabinet and communicated with the site developers. Calls with the site developers were conducted to discuss issues identified during testing. A final report was sent to site developers with suggested course(s) of action needing to be taken to remediate accessibility barriers. Expected outcome being that the site/portal would meet Se
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Public Awareness Activity Estimated Number Reached Newsletters 11574 Printed Materials 0 Listsrvs / Blogs / Social Media 36916 Internet Information 90814 Other Electronic Media 1675 PSA / Radio / TV 0 Presentation / Expo / Conference 58 Total 141037 Social media marketing was a strong focus during this reporting year. Facebook following tripled on our reuse page on Facebook. We highlighted partnership and by linking to our partners (Volunteer groups, nonprofits, DME suppliers) were able to drive more views to our page. Calls for action resulted in an exponential growth in certain post shares. In a time when gathering in person was mostly disallowed due to Covid the social media push was timely and effective. Highlighting partners has also aided in cementing those relationships and the reciprocal nature of social media was experienced as partners shared our posts and also highlighted our work.
2. Our partner site in northern Kentucky, Redwood Assistive Technology and Resource Center, celebrated National Assistive Technology Awareness Day with clients and staff at Redwood using many of their favorite AT items in their program rooms and publicizing the event on Facebook. This event was amplified by social media shares from the Coordinating Center.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 2,118 | 05 | 2,123 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 1,041 | 15 | 1,056 |
Representative of Education | 394 | 04 | 398 |
Representative of Employment | 88 | 00 | 88 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 12,972 | 22 | 12,994 |
Representative of Community Living | 1,171 | 21 | 1,192 |
Representative of Technology | 599 | 21 | 620 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 18,383 | 88 | 18,471 |
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Our Reuse / Refurbish initiative, Project CARAT, partnered with great success with the international volunteer organization, JustServe. JustServe greatly extended our ability to accept DME donations by assembling teams to pickup the medical equipment from donors. They also offered assistance in transporting equipment from our refurbish centers to consumers in need. With JustServe's assistance we were able to capitalize on larger donations (i.e. wheelchair lift trailers, powerchairs etc) that we would otherwise had to pass on. Additionally, in a time of Covid concern, JustServe was able to assemble same-household teams of volunteers that allowed for a curb to curb transport of items without any risk of exposure.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
This partnership was a zero cost initiative that helped us and JustServe attend to our individual missions. For Project CARAT, it allowed for the capture and distribution of more DME. For JustServe, it allowed for the achievement of their mission of service. With our very small staff and mandated Covid restrictions we would have lost out on many donations. Instead we saw a year over year increase of $118,499.43 additional savings for Kentucky DME consumers as compared to last year.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Reuse;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Project CARAT also partnered with international health organization, SOS. SOS improves global health and the environment through recovery and redistribution of surplus medical supplies. Their mission overlaps with our mission, but on an international level. By partnering with SOS we were able to receive several pallet loads of their surplus to share with our partners across the Commonwealth.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Another zero cost partnership, this allowed us to serve more consumers by increasing the flow of used DME through our program. This mutually mission addressing partnership will continue going forward. For the reporting period SOS is estimating that that they donated 6,125 lbs. of equipment to Project CARAT, totaling approximately $98,000 in value.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Reuse;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
Provided technical assistance to Office for Vocational Rehabilitation and Education and Workforce Development Cabinet. Through our work with this team, KATS Coordinator served as a Subject Matter Expert (SME) for accessible ICT. Areas of improvement were identified both on the cabinet level and agency (OVR) level to address accessibility of its Information and Communication Technologies as it pertains to both internal (employees) and external (the consumers served).
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Early successes include OVR hiring a dedicated Accessibility Coordinator through its Rehab Tech Branch. EWCD has also posted a position for a Cabinet level Accessible Communications Developer.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | No |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Thu Mar 03 2022 16:52:20 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)